Features of linux and windows

Selecting the appropriate operating system (OS) is an important decision that influences every aspect of how you interact with your computer. Whether you’re configuring a personal device, setting up a server, or overseeing an enterprise IT infrastructure, the choice between Linux and Windows can significantly impact your efficiency and workflow. Each system offers unique benefits and poses distinct challenges, catering to different user needs and scenarios.

Linux is known for its robust security and open-source nature, offering versatility across various distributions like Ubuntu, Fedora, and CentOS. Windows, on the other hand, is known for its intuitive interface, maintaining a strong presence in the desktop market and being the preferred OS for many businesses that rely heavily on Microsoft-centric software.

The decision often hinges on specific requirements, technical expertise, and personal preferences. As both operating systems evolve to keep pace with the demands of modern users and advancements in technology, gaining a deeper understanding of their capabilities becomes increasingly important.

For those eager to deepen their knowledge or become proficient with both operating systems, Server Academy offers comprehensive courses that span from basic installations to advanced administrative tasks. Whether you are just starting your tech journey or looking to enhance your skills, our courses are designed to prepare you for success in the ever-changing IT landscape.

When considering the selection of an operating system, understanding the key differences between Linux and Windows is crucial. Here’s an enhanced comparative breakdown that includes performance aspects:

This table provides a detailed overview of the primary aspects to consider when comparing Linux and Windows, helping to guide the OS choice according to the specific needs and preferences of users. From cost and ease of use to performance and software compatibility, each operating system offers distinct advantages tailored to different scenarios.

Let’s dive into our first major topic: cost and licensing.

Cost and Licensing

When choosing an operating system, the cost of licensing and total ownership are crucial factors. Linux and Windows present distinctly different models that suit various financial and operational preferences.

Linux: The Open Source Advantage

Linux is open-source, which means it is free to use, modify, and distribute. This aspect makes Linux particularly attractive for personal use, startups, and educational settings where budgets are tight. Most Linux distributions, including popular ones like Ubuntu, Fedora, and CentOS, can be downloaded and used at no cost. Additionally, the open-source nature of Linux allows for customization without licensing constraints, appealing to organizations that require tailored solutions.

The community-driven development of Linux not only enhances its security and functionality but also reduces costs related to technical support. With a vast network of developers and users, troubleshooting help and updates are readily accessible and free.

Windows: Licensing Costs and Enterprise Features

Windows, on the other hand, is proprietary and requires a licensing fee from Microsoft. The cost varies significantly based on the Windows version and the specific licensing agreement. Individual users often incur a one-time fee included with new hardware purchases, but businesses may face substantial costs for multiple licenses, especially with Windows Server editions.

Businesses frequently prefer Windows for its compatibility with essential software, particularly Microsoft’s own suite of productivity tools. Despite its higher licensing fees, Windows provides value through regular updates, advanced security measures, and professional support, all crucial for maintaining dependable business operations.

Cost Comparison and Considerations

Assessing the choice between Linux and Windows involves more than initial software costs. Total cost of ownership should include operation, maintenance, and hardware requirements. Linux might require a steeper learning curve or specialized personnel, potentially increasing training or staffing expenses. Conversely, Windows might involve higher ongoing costs due to licensing, updates, and security management.

The decision between Linux and Windows often depends on the specific needs and budget constraints of your specific use case. For those seeking a cost-effective, customizable solution, Linux may be the better choice. For those in need of extensive software support and simpler maintenance, investing in Windows could provide greater value.

System Performance

When evaluating operating systems, performance is a critical factor that can greatly influence user satisfaction and productivity. Both Linux and Windows have distinct approaches to managing system resources, which can affect their performance in different scenarios.

Linux: Efficient and Resource-Friendly

Linux is often praised for its efficiency and ability to run smoothly on various hardware, from old desktops to high-end servers. One of the key strengths of Linux is its minimal resource usage, which allows it to perform well even on systems with limited processing power or memory. This efficiency makes Linux a popular choice for developers and IT professionals who require stability and speed, especially in server environments or for running complex computational processes.

The modular nature of Linux also contributes to its performance advantages. Users can choose from a range of lightweight distributions that are specifically designed to be lean and fast, or they can customize their installations to include only the necessary components, further reducing system overhead.

Windows: Optimized for Broad Compatibility

Windows, with its focus on broad compatibility and user-friendliness, tends to be more resource-intensive than Linux. This is partly due to the OS’s graphical user interface (GUI) and the array of background services it runs to support a wide variety of software and hardware. However, recent versions of Windows have seen significant improvements in performance optimization. Windows 10 and Windows 11, for instance, offer enhanced capabilities for managing system resources more effectively, particularly with updates that optimize speed and responsiveness.

Despite its resource-intensive nature, Windows provides robust performance management tools that help maintain system responsiveness. It supports a variety of hardware out of the box and is optimized for high-performance tasks, especially in gaming and multimedia applications. For businesses and less tech-savvy users, the convenience of Windows may outweigh the benefits of Linux’s lower system requirements, especially considering the compatibility with a wide range of off-the-shelf software.

Performance in Server and Desktop Environments

In server environments, Linux is often the OS of choice due to its stability, security, and lower overhead, making it ideal for servers that need to manage large volumes of requests efficiently. Windows servers, while generally requiring more resources, offer excellent support for .NET applications and other Microsoft products, making them indispensable in many corporate environments that rely on Microsoft technologies.

On the desktop, while Linux may offer better performance on older or less powerful hardware, Windows continues to be favored for its ease of use and extensive hardware support, particularly in environments that require specific applications only available on Windows.

Security Features

Security is a paramount concern for any operating system, and both Linux and Windows have developed robust mechanisms to protect users against vulnerabilities and attacks. Each system’s approach to security reflects its underlying design philosophies and target user bases.

Linux: Built-in Security and Open Source Transparency

Linux is often regarded as one of the most secure operating systems, partly due to its open-source nature. The source code of Linux is available for review and modification, allowing security experts and developers worldwide to examine and bolster its defenses continuously. This collaborative approach helps ensure that vulnerabilities are quickly identified and patched.

Linux employs a strict user privilege model that helps prevent unauthorized access to key system components. Most Linux distributions require that users operate under limited permissions, with administrative tasks reserved for the ‘root’ user. This can mitigate the damage that can be caused by user error or malicious software. Moreover, Linux distributions often come with powerful security tools like SELinux (Security-Enhanced Linux) and AppArmor, which provide robust mandatory access control systems to further secure applications and processes.

Windows: Comprehensive Security with Regular Updates

Windows has historically been the target of more cyberattacks than Linux, partly because of its large user base and ubiquity in corporate and personal computing environments. To combat this, Microsoft has heavily invested in security features. Windows Defender, a built-in antivirus and anti-malware service, provides real-time protection against a range of threats and is regularly updated to recognize new viruses and malware.

Windows also incorporates an automatic update system that ensures users receive the latest security patches and system updates as soon as they are available. This is crucial for protecting users from newly discovered threats. Moreover, Windows 10 and 11 have introduced more advanced security features, such as Windows Hello for biometric authentication and BitLocker for data encryption, enhancing the overall security posture of the operating system.

Managing Security Risks

Both Linux and Windows offer strong security features, but the effectiveness of these features can depend greatly on user behavior and system configuration. Regular updates, vigilant monitoring of system activities, and adherence to recommended security practices are essential for maintaining security on any platform.

Linux’s transparency and customization options make it a favorite among tech-savvy users and those who need to secure highly sensitive information. Meanwhile, Windows provides a comprehensive security solution that caters well to enterprises and less technical users who need an OS that balances security with ease of use.

User Experience

User experience (UX) is a critical aspect of any operating system, as it directly affects how comfortably and efficiently users can interact with their computers. Both Linux and Windows offer distinct experiences that cater to different user needs and preferences.

Linux: Customizability and Choice

The user experience with Linux is highly customizable. Linux comes in multiple distributions, each offering unique interfaces and user experiences. For instance, Ubuntu provides a clean and friendly interface similar to Windows, making it a good choice for those new to Linux. On the other hand, distributions like Fedora or Debian might appeal more to experienced users who require a more robust or minimalistic environment.

Linux’s strength lies in its flexibility; users can change almost every aspect of the system, from the desktop environment to the kernel itself. This high level of customization makes Linux particularly appealing to developers and technical users who want their systems to operate in very specific ways.

However, the downside of this flexibility is that Linux can have a steeper learning curve, especially for those not familiar with command-line interfaces. Shown below is an example of what the CLI of a Linux server can look like:

Картинка с сайта: serveracademy.com

While many distributions are working to make Linux more accessible, it generally requires more effort to learn than Windows.

Of course, I had to include a screenshot of what Linux Desktop looks like since we are comparing Linux to Windows, this way we can compare apples to apples. Below is what Linux Mint Desktop looks like – with the terminal open in the background:

Картинка с сайта: serveracademy.com

Windows: Familiarity and Ease of Use

Windows offers a consistent, polished, and generally user-friendly interface. It’s designed for ease of use and familiarity, which explains its dominance in personal computing and business environments. The start menu, taskbar, and other elements of the Windows interface have evolved but remained intuitive, even for novice users. An example of the user interface for Windows Server is shown below:

Картинка с сайта: serveracademy.com

Some users prefer the Linux CLI over a GUI (graphical user interface) as it removes the need to use a mouse which can be slower than typing commands if you are comfortable at the Linux CLI.

Windows is also known for its excellent hardware compatibility, automatically recognizing and configuring new hardware and peripherals. This plug-and-play experience reduces the need for manual driver installation and system configuration, which can be a significant hurdle in Linux.

Additionally, Windows supports a wide range of commercial software and games, which enhances the user experience for those who need specific applications or wish to use their PC for leisure activities. This extensive software compatibility is a major reason why many users choose Windows over Linux.

User Experience

User experience (UX) is a critical aspect of any operating system, as it directly affects how comfortably and efficiently users can interact with their computers. Both Linux and Windows offer distinct experiences that cater to different user needs and preferences.

Linux: Customizability and Choice

The user experience with Linux is highly customizable. Linux comes in multiple distributions, each offering unique interfaces and user experiences. For instance, Ubuntu provides a clean and friendly interface similar to Windows, making it a good choice for those new to Linux. On the other hand, distributions like Fedora or Debian might appeal more to experienced users who require a more robust or minimalistic environment.

Linux’s strength lies in its flexibility; users can change almost every aspect of the system, from the desktop environment to the kernel itself. This high level of customization makes Linux particularly appealing to developers and technical users who want their systems to operate in very specific ways.

However, the downside of this flexibility is that Linux can have a steeper learning curve, especially for those not familiar with command-line interfaces. While many distributions are working to make Linux more accessible, it generally requires more effort to learn than Windows.

Windows: Familiarity and Ease of Use

Windows offers a consistent, polished, and generally user-friendly interface. It’s designed for ease of use and familiarity, which explains its dominance in personal computing and business environments. The start menu, taskbar, and other elements of the Windows interface have evolved but remained intuitive, even for novice users.

Windows is also known for its excellent hardware compatibility, automatically recognizing and configuring new hardware and peripherals. This plug-and-play experience reduces the need for manual driver installation and system configuration, which can be a significant hurdle in Linux.

Additionally, Windows supports a wide range of commercial software and games, which enhances the user experience for those who need specific applications or wish to use their PC for leisure activities. This extensive software compatibility is a major reason why many users choose Windows over Linux.

Compatibility and Software

Compatibility with software and hardware is a key factor that influences the choice between Linux and Windows. Both operating systems have their strengths and limitations when it comes to supporting various applications and devices.

Linux: Open Source Software and Hardware Compatibility

Linux has historically excelled in supporting a wide range of hardware, especially older equipment that may no longer be supported by the latest versions of Windows. This is due to the Linux community’s commitment to creating and maintaining drivers for a vast array of devices. However, Linux can sometimes lag behind in supporting the latest hardware, such as newly released graphics cards or wireless adapters, until the community develops and optimizes the necessary drivers.

On the software side, Linux is robust in its support for open-source and developer-focused tools. There is a wealth of applications available through the Linux package management systems that can be installed easily and maintained across system updates. For software developers, Linux provides powerful programming environments, utilities, and languages, making it a preferred OS among programmers and IT professionals.

Despite these strengths, Linux may encounter compatibility issues with commercial software that is typically designed for Windows. Major office suites, multimedia editing tools, and especially mainstream games often do not have native Linux versions, which can limit the usability of Linux for general consumers or professionals in certain industries.

Windows: Broad Software Ecosystem and Peripheral Support

Windows maintains a dominant position in software compatibility, primarily due to its widespread use in both personal and business environments. It supports nearly all major commercial software packages, including the Microsoft Office Suite, Adobe Creative Cloud, and various business applications that are essential in corporate settings. Additionally, Windows is the preferred platform for PC gaming, with extensive support for the latest game titles and gaming hardware.

Hardware compatibility is another area where Windows excels. Microsoft works closely with hardware manufacturers to ensure that new devices work seamlessly with Windows, often with little to no need for manual driver installation by the user. This plug-and-play capability extends to a wide range of peripherals, from printers and scanners to sophisticated scientific instruments, making Windows a practical choice for users who need reliable hardware interaction without extensive configuration.

Server Use

The choice of an operating system for server environments is crucial, as it affects everything from system stability and security to how well server resources are utilized. Linux and Windows both offer compelling options for server use, each with its own set of advantages.

Linux: Dominance in Server Markets

Linux is widely recognized for its robust performance in server settings. It’s the backbone of many enterprise servers, web servers, and is the primary choice for cloud and virtualization infrastructures. One of the key reasons for Linux’s dominance in the server market is its stability and reliability. Linux servers are known for running for years without the need for reboots, which is critical for mission-critical applications.

Another advantage of Linux in server use is its scalability and flexibility. Linux can be stripped down to the bare essentials needed for specific server tasks, reducing the use of system resources and enhancing security by minimizing potential attack surfaces. This modularity makes Linux ideal for everything from lightweight web servers to powerful database servers.

Moreover, the open-source nature of Linux means there are no licensing fees associated with running multiple instances, which can significantly reduce costs in large-scale deployments.

Windows: Integrated with Enterprise Environments

Windows Server, while not as dominant as Linux in overall numbers, holds a significant place in enterprise environments, particularly those that rely heavily on other Microsoft software and services. Windows Server integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Active Directory, SQL Server, SharePoint, and Exchange, providing a cohesive environment that is easier to manage and support.

Windows Server is known for its ease of use, particularly in terms of user interface and management tools like Windows Admin Center and PowerShell. These tools make server management more accessible to administrators who may not be as comfortable with command-line interfaces, which are more common in Linux environments.

Additionally, for applications developed specifically for the .NET framework, Windows Server is often the preferred or sometimes the only feasible option. Microsoft has also been improving Windows Server’s capabilities for hosting websites and applications, making it a competitive option for hosting environments that rely on .NET technologies.

Scalability and Flexibility

Scalability and flexibility are crucial characteristics of any operating system, especially in environments where technology needs evolve rapidly. Both Linux and Windows offer solutions that cater to expanding and changing requirements, but they do so in different ways.

Linux: Highly Scalable and Customizable

Linux is renowned for its scalability and the ability to customize it to fit any need, from tiny embedded systems in IoT devices to massive server farms powering major websites. This flexibility comes from Linux’s modular design, which allows users to add or remove features based on specific requirements, ensuring that the system uses only the necessary resources.

For businesses that expect to scale their operations or need tailored solutions, Linux offers an advantage by allowing for extensive customization without additional licensing costs. This makes Linux particularly attractive for startups and tech companies that need to innovate quickly without being bogged down by software limitations.

Moreover, the performance of Linux systems generally remains consistent as they scale up, with many Linux distributions designed to manage large workloads efficiently. This is evident in the widespread use of Linux in supercomputing and large-scale cloud environments, where performance and resource management are paramount.

Windows: Scalability with Familiar Tools

Windows also offers robust scalability options, particularly with the Windows Server family. Windows Server is designed to handle enterprise-level operations, supporting vast data centers and complex network architectures. It provides scalability primarily through features like Active Directory, which helps manage thousands of user accounts and permissions efficiently, and Hyper-V for virtualization needs.

While Windows may not offer the same level of customization as Linux, it compensates with a comprehensive suite of management tools that make scaling less technically demanding. These tools are often graphical and integrated, which can reduce the learning curve and administrative overhead associated with more complex system configurations.

Windows is typically favored in environments where there is already a significant investment in Microsoft technologies, as it ensures compatibility and integration with existing infrastructure, reducing potential friction during scaling processes.

Conclusion

Linux shines with its open-source nature, providing a cost-effective, customizable, and highly secure environment. It’s ideal for those who require robust performance, extensive customization, or are operating on a tight budget. Linux is particularly dominant in server use due to its stability, security, and scalability, making it a favorite among developers, IT professionals, and educational institutions.

Windows, on the other hand, stands out for its user-friendliness, comprehensive support, and broad compatibility with software and hardware. It is particularly well-suited to business environments that rely on Microsoft products and services. For users who prioritize ease of use, extensive software availability, and strong vendor support, Windows remains the preferred choice.

Choosing the right operating system depends on your specific needs:

• Cost Efficiency: Linux offers a virtually unbeatable price point, being mostly free, whereas Windows involves licensing fees.
• User Experience: Windows provides a more familiar and polished user interface, while Linux offers unparalleled flexibility and customization.
• Software and Hardware Compatibility: Windows boasts extensive support for the latest consumer software and peripherals, while Linux excels in stability and performance, especially in server settings.
• Security and Stability: Linux generally offers better security and stability, thanks to its open-source community, whereas Windows benefits from regular updates and professional support from Microsoft.

Both operating systems are continually evolving, incorporating new technologies and adapting to modern computing needs. For those looking to expand their skills in either OS, or both, Server Academy offers comprehensive courses that delve into the deeper technical aspects and practical applications of Linux and Windows. Enhancing your understanding and capabilities with these systems will equip you with the skills necessary to navigate the complexities of today’s technological landscape effectively.

Уровень сложностиПростой

Время на прочтение4 мин

Количество просмотров95K

Тема довольно популярна, особенно в последнее время, из-за блокировки Microsoft собственного сайта для скачивания окон в России. Конечно, это не стало серьезным препятствием для продвинутых пользователей. Многие задумались о переходе на другую операционную систему. MacOS такой же коммерческий проект, как и Windows. И после подобного поведения компании, у которой находится большинство пользователей настольных пк в мире, никто не гарантирует, что в компании Apple не захотят поступить также. Linux на этом фоне стал куда более привлекательным, поскольку относится к открытому программному обеспечению. Это понятие тоже можно считать условным по той причине, что некоторые дистрибутивы хоть и распространяются бесплатно, но принадлежат коммерческим корпорациям (например, Red Hat и SUSE).

Картинка с сайта: habr.com

В этой статье опишу свои причины переезда к пингвинам. Сразу хочется отметить, что за последние годы Linux стал куда дружелюбнее к новым пользователям, которые переезжают с других операционных систем. При этом, до сих пор существует мнение, что Linux создан только для программистов и системных администраторов, сложен в освоении. У этой операционной системы другая идеология, в отличие от Windows, где система все решает за пользователя.

Идеология Linux

Когда говорят, что Linux — свободное ПО, имеют в виду не только его бесплатное распространение, но и те возможности, которые даются пользователю при использовании системы. В Linux пользователь — полноправный хозяин своего компьютера. Только он решает как будет работать его ПК, какие программы будут на нем стоять и какие службы будут работать в фоне. Windows, с одной стороны, прост в установке и использовании, с другой — лишает пользователя права выбора. Когда я сравниваю эти системы и говорю о преимуществах Linux, у меня нет цели задеть пользователей Windows. Хочется рассказать об альтернативе, а выбор оставить на усмотрение читателя.

Основные преимущества Linux, которые вывел для себя и которые подтолкнули на смену операционной системы:

• Высокая скорость работы

• Персонализация

• Стабильность

• Огромный выбор дистрибутивов для разных задач

Теперь обо всем по порядку.

Высокая скорость работы

Система работает намного быстрее Windows, тратит меньше ресурсов на выполнение задач и исключает все лишнее. Приведу пример для сравнения. Windows 10 home, которой пользовался раньше, на рабочем столе, без никаких запущенных приложений со стороны пользователя, потребляла 4 гб озу. Если проанализировать рынок, то сейчас все ноутбуки среднего сегмента для офиса и работы содержат 8 гб. Выше, как правило, ставят в игровые решения. Получается следующая ситуация. При покупке ноутбука, половину оперативной памяти съедает система. Теперь о Linux. Все зависит от графической оболочки. Если взять самую тяжёлую, KDE Plasma, то увидим, что без открытых приложений она тратит 500 мб озу в среднем. Конечно, сравнение не совсем честное, потому что кроме графики за кулисами также как и в Windows, выполняются определённые процессы. На дистрибутиве Manjaro с Plasma на рабочем столе получим чуть больше 1 гб озу. Быстрее в 4 раза. Для компьютеров с 4 гб озу — вторая жизнь. Теперь возьмём решение ещё легче. Тот же самый Manjaro с Xfce потребляет 500-600 мб. А если взять Arch Linux с Xfce и не нагружать его какими-то процессами, то можно снизить потребление до 125-200 мб. Компьютеры 10-15 летней давности прекрасно справятся и смогут и дальше работать. При этом из Windows туда подойдёт разве что XP, поддержу которого уже давно прекратили. Arch Linux для 32 битных систем поддерживается до сих пор. Для обладателей современного и мощного железа этот пункт может быть не таким привлекательным, поэтому перейдём к следующему.

Картинка с сайта: habr.com

Персонализация

Это преимущество, думаю, понравится всем, кому важен внешний вид системы и её работа под капотом. В Linux настраивается абсолютно все: от виджетов на рабочем столе, до самостоятельной настройки работы всей системы в целом. Любой конфигурационный файл можно переписать, настроить под себя. Обладая определёнными знаниями можно создать собственную версию операционной системы. То же касается внешнего вида: огромный выбор виджетов, иконок, цветов. Большое количество уже предустановлено из коробки, ещё больше можно скачать. Минималистам также может понравиться Linux. Тот же Arch изначально не имеет программ с графическим интерфейсом. Это позволяет установить только то, что нужно и не добавлять ничего лишнего. Красоту предоставит KDE, но, строго говоря, красота — вещь субъективная и каждому нравится свое. Всегда всё можно переделать под себя. А в Windows максимум можно поменять обои, цвета и иконки. И то, иногда для этого нужно ставить специальные программы.

Картинка с сайта: habr.com

Стабильность

Это преимущество действительно важно. При работе с компьютером хочется быть уверенным, что ничего не слетит. Все мы, думаю, сталкивались с синим экраном Windows, который иногда приводит к переустановке системы без возможности восстановления утраченных данных. В Linux тоже такое возможно, особенно на дистрибутивах которые используют самые последние решения (Arch, Manjaro), но в системах с длительной поддержкой (Debian, Ubuntu, и все их производные), как правило сбои бывают очень редко. Каждую версию LTS поддерживают сразу лет по 5 и более, и поэтому, если пользователю важнее стабильность, чем свежее ПО, после установки системы можно вообще не обновляться, и система будет работать без сбоев продолжительное время. Обновления в Linux вообще не навязываются. В Windows, как мы знаем, обновления идут независимо от пользователя и чтобы остановить этот конвейер, нужно устанавливать специальные программы.

Картинка с сайта: habr.com

Огромный выбор дистрибутивов для разных задач

В Linux существует тысячи дистрибутивов, созданных под определённые задачи. Где-то системы сделаны под офисные задачи (например, Ubuntu), где-то для профессионалов своей области (NixOS), где-то самые свежие программные решения (Arch), где-то не очень, но более стабильные и проверенные годами (Debian). Каждый найдёт себе дистрибутив по вкусу и под свои задачи.

Картинка с сайта: habr.com

Итог

В этой статье описал преимущества Linux, которыми руководствовался для перехода на эту операционную систему. Кто-то может со мной не согласиться, кому-то больше нравится Windows и другие ОС. Каждый выбирает сам, и кто-то, я уверен, найдёт десятки плюсов у своих систем. Буду рад конструктивной критике и обмену мнениями.

Choosing the best platform – Linux or Windows is complicated because both systems are versatile and capable of doing many mission-oriented and regular tasks. So, if I ask you which one is the best system, Linux or Windows?

On this topic, you can start an ever-ending discussion. Windows OS is the most used operating system in the desktop world, no doubt in this statement, but “most used” can’t prove itself to be the best option in a bigger prospect.

We all know that cigarettes are one of the “most used” consumer products in the world, but still, it’s not good for health. It’s challenging to quit smoking because people are habituated to this addiction. So why have I given this entirely off-topic example?

As we all know, humanity is a slave of habit, and accordingly, most users are quite habituated to using a Windows system for quite a long time. Now they can’t leave it, just like smoking. If a bird remains in a case, how will it enjoy freedom? Even one day, the bird will forget he can fly.

Linux or Windows: Which One is the Best Platform?

Linux has thousands of overriding factors that can prove the best platform over the Windows system. Here, I want to clarify that Linux is a kernel, and with the compilation of many essential software and drivers, it makes a distro.

Recommended Post: Linux vs. Mac OS: 15 Reasons Why You Must Use Linux Instead of Mac OS

Hundreds of Linux distributions are available in the market, which stand apart from the crowd and compete with Windows OS or macOS. In this article, I will tell you some of the best things to know when choosing the best OS platform between Linux and Windows. So sit tight and learn all the facts and findings that will unchain you and let you feel free.

1. Linux vs. Windows: Basic Foundation

Linux follows a distinguishing trait: its un-unified development process. No single entity has a complete grip on Linux. The Linux kernel, the base of the operating system, is developed and maintained by the Linux Foundation, where lots of community volunteers around the world are involved and make their best contribution.

Linux distros are what we usually see as Linux OS. Many companies and volunteers have created these Linux distros worldwide by compiling desktop environments, software, and hardware drivers with the core Kernel.

Each Linux distribution has a development cycle unrelated to kernel development. Moreover, many organizations and community enthusiasts have created desktop environments and window managers. Linux kernel and distros became popular, widely used, and adored by the mass people because of the support and contribution of its vast community.

Now let me say something about the Windows system. There is only one company – Microsoft- doing all the development and maintenance for the whole OS, kernel, desktop environment, and much of the pre-installed software. You have to accept whatever they offer you, whether useful or not.

2. System Stability

Windows OS is not lightweight or speedy; instead, it tends to get sluggish over time. You may feel your system is outdated if not adequately maintained. Linux systems are much quicker and don’t require lots of resources. It can run on age-old hardware and modern high-end machines as well.

Картинка с сайта: www.ubuntupit.com

Many distros come with bare-bone elements to ensure the best performances for the ultimate users. If you install a Linux distro and run it for a long time without any update or upgrade, you will not face a single problem, and yet you will find the system as new as it was.

3. Hardware Support

Windows OS demands high configuration for optimal performance. But if you have an age-old desktop or laptop with lower-end hardware, I strongly suggest you use a lightweight Linux distro like Lubuntu or Peppermint OS to give it a second life. You can use that older machine as a media server or FTP server.

Linux Kernel comes with a full-fledged driver solution built for the age-old machine. But in the case of a Windows system, you will face driver and software compatibility issues, system freezing issues, hardware-related driver problems, etc. Moreover, Linux is fully compatible with the most recent devices, ensuring the highest performance.

4. Linux vs. Windows: Targeted User Group

Windows OS is commonly said to be the best for novice users, but Linux can be suitable for beginners and advanced users. Windows is user-friendly because, from childhood, you have only seen it in your home, school, or friend’s computer; you never saw a Linux system around.

Картинка с сайта: www.ubuntupit.com

So it was difficult for you to understand that there were many other far better options available on the other side of the coin. I suggest using a Linux distro like Ubuntu or Linux Mint, and I bet you will never look back again to get either Windows OS or macOS.

5. F.O.S.S vs. Proprietary

The motto of Linux is to let you feel the freedom of getting free and open source software. On the other hand, most of the software used in Windows and macOS are paid or proprietary. There is also some freeware software available for Windows OS, but eventually, it will cost you a penny when you need the essential tools or features on that specific application.

Картинка с сайта: www.ubuntupit.com

6. Linux vs. Windows Security and Privacy

Security and personal privacy are the cornerstone factors for the Linux OS. That’s why it is very popular among IT professionals. By default, the Linux system doesn’t provide root access or administrative privileges to users.

This is why the threats can’t hit the core of the Linux system except for some files and folders. But in the Windows system, malware and viruses get access to the system files easily and can damage a large scale.

Linux kernel is open source; thus, it’s more secure and well maintained due to the involvement of a large community that scans the flaws regularly. Moreover, maximum viruses or threats are being created for the Windows system, keeping in mind.

That’s why you need a good antivirus for Windows OS, just at the beginning. Linux is immune from threats, but if you follow the best practices, you probably will be safer than a Windows system.

Recommended Post: Debian vs. Ubuntu: Top 15 Things To Know Before Choosing the Best One

In a container of Windows OS, your every step and footprint are tracked and recorded. Microsoft keeps all personal information, and we don’t know with whom it shares the information. On the other hand, it’s quite impossible to make any backdoor in the Linux kernel.

7. Antivirus and Malware Threat

Windows OS is the best home for viruses and malware threats. I believe you know it. After completing the Windows installation, you search for a good antivirus to protect the system. But in the case of Linux, you hardly need to think about it. Linux security and malware protection are hardened to some extent “fresh-out-of-the-box.”

Картинка с сайта: www.ubuntupit.com

But you know, the threat is a threat; it may come anywhere, anytime. Linux has a huge community to help you out. Whenever any malware or threats go into the Linux system, the community will provide you with a security patch to remove it quickly.

8. Linux or Windows: Customization

Linux is much more customizable than Windows OS. In the Windows system, everything comes pre-configured and as a closed source. There is hardly anything that you can change to meet your needs. There is a command shell, “cmd,” but it’s not useful for making root-level changes. Nowadays, things are changing with the tools of “PowerShell.” But that’s not enough to attract the developers’ community.

Картинка с сайта: www.ubuntupit.com

On the other hand, you can change every bit of the Linux system as per your requirements. The Linux kernel itself and all the software used in Linux come as open source, and users can make any modification under specific rules. Linux CLI environment is too robust to perform root-level tasks. Moreover, you can change your Linux distros’ overall look and feel via distro-specific tweak tools.

9. Administrative Privilege and Root Access

Linux provides root-level administrative access through a command-line interface where users can perform mission-oriented tasks effortlessly. With the help of root access, you can change every bit of things in the Linux ecosystem. But in the Windows system, everything is pre-set by Microsoft. You hardly have any administrative privileges to perform root-level tasks.

10. Programming Platform for Developers

If you are a programmer or intend to do programming, I highly suggest using Linux instead of Windows OS. You will find lots of programming languages or IDEs here. All those developers’ tools are made considering the Linux environment first. Hence, they work efficiently and smoothly on the Linux platform.

11. Install, Update, and Upgrade

It’s easy to install and update systems or any third-party software in Linux. All the software and system update files are included in a centralized repository, making it safe and more accessible to update the system and software.

But in a Windows system, updating the system and third-party applications is hell difficult and time-consuming. Windows not only pulls updates from the Microsoft site but also takes every software update from an app-specific software protocol.

12. Different Flavors for Different Needs

Linux is more capable than Windows OS in this sector. There are hundreds of Linux distros based on different needs and various desktop flavors. If you are a Windows user, Linux has Zorin OS or Linux Mint to help you make a smooth transition from the previous continuation.

If you are a macOS user, Linux also covers you with Ubuntu or Elementary OS. Or you can even use one specific Linux distro with some Linux desktop environments. Moreover, there are some task-specific Linux distros available out there, like Kali Linux, for penetration testing or hacking.

13. Linux vs. Windows: Gaming Area

Yes, I confess that there was a time when Linux was not a good choice as a gaming platform. Game developers were not interested in developing their games for this platform. But now the times have changed. Most of the latest and trending games will be found for Linux. Now, you can play all the best Linux games or Steam games both offline and online. Moreover, it’s effortless to play games on Linux and about the gaming experience! You let me know in the comment section.

14. Software Availability and Compatibility

If you ask me about the software availability and compatibility in the Linux ecosystem, I bet you that Linux wins the crown. Linux covers all sectors, including personal software, media software, business suites, design materials, server tools, productivity applications, programming and app development software, and what’s not. You can check a detailed editorial list on Best Linux Software.

15. Photoshop Alternative

Image editing software, Photoshop, is one of the vital elements that prevent users from adopting any other OS except Windows. Photoshop doesn’t support Linux. But you get a lot of good alternatives to Adobe Photoshop in Linux distros, including GIMP, Darktable, Krita, etc.

16. Alternative To Office Suite

Like Photoshop, the MS Office suite is also an outstanding software that keeps the appeal of using Windows OS. A lot of users and organizations depend on this sort of productivity software. In the Linux world, there are many better options available to the MS Office suite. LibreOffice is one of them, and it can give a good fight to the Microsoft Office suite.

Read More: Top 10 Best Free Office Suite Software as MS Office Alternative for Linux

17. Multimedia Editor

If you get many options for editing multimedia files in the Windows system, Linux also provides the same number of choices and sometimes even more. Here, you can check a list of the Best Video Editing Software for Linux.

18. Support of Windows Software via Wine or PlayOnLinux

As I said earlier, there are lots of choices for Windows software in Linux, but still, if you want to use a custom-made Windows app or any app in Linux, there is a way out to do that trick. Wine and PlayOnLinux are there for you to perform this Windows hack. With the help of these two Linux software, you can run many essential Windows software in Linux. Moreover, you can also play some Windows OS-specific games on Linux via PlayOnLinux.

19. Software Management System

A software management system is an essential element for any OS. System stability and flexibility depend on software management. In this regard, Windows OS remains far behind the Linux system. In Windows OS, you have to go to the software-specific site to get the installer file to download and install that software.

This file may be tempered or includes many adware, malware, adverts, etc.; you may not know it. That’s time-consuming and not safe if the vendor is not authenticated.

On the other hand, Linux distros provide a centralized software center for installing any applications. The community thoroughly checks the software, and there is hardly any possibility of including adware, malware, adverts, etc. Moreover, there are many ways to install the software in the Linux system. If one process doesn’t work or you are uncomfortable with command-line tools, you can use another anytime.

20. Linux Server or Windows Server

If you consider server security, stability, freedom of choice, hardware compatibility, and cost-effectiveness, then the Linux server beats the Windows-based server in every way. Windows is a popular option for desktop usage (novices think so), and Linux is the best option for a server-mode system.

Linux server system offers a lot of customization options with a wide range of effective monitoring and analyzing tools. Linux servers are less vulnerable than Windows servers in terms of malware and online threats. It’s impossible to create any backdoor in the Linux kernel, whereas the Windows system is sensitive to that situation.

21. Blue Screen and De-fragmentation

Blue screen with fsck running and disk defragmentation are known issues you may get in your Windows OS. But in the Linux distros, you may get hardly any problem like this one. Linux system handles all the file layouts or file system efficiently, and most of the time, you don’t even need to run de-fragmentation.

Картинка с сайта: www.ubuntupit.com

22. File Extension To “run” The File

Windows or DOS rely on the file extension to run any file type. But Linux doesn’t depend on that process. You can give a file any name, and it will not affect the type of file it is. Linux uses a filesystem called “execute bit.” Whenever A user tries to run a file, the Linux process system looks at the file header for more information on how to run it instead of on the file extension like Windows.

23. Linux or Windows: Task Automation

There are many tools and command cheat sheets in the Linux system to make your task as automatic as it can’t be on Windows. Many servers or IT experts prefer to use Linux over Windows to automate their routine system-side tasks.

24. Process and Resource Management

In Linux, the software process management is much more powerful and effective. With the help of a simple command, you can kill or abort any software that runs into the background if it causes any problems. However, in Windows, it’s easy to run a task manager. Still, it is not as sufficient as Linux because the Windows task manager can’t always kill or stop the problematic software running in the backend.

Recommended Post: Linux Mint vs. Ubuntu: 15 Facts To Know Before Choosing The Best One

Linux manages its resources more effectively than a Windows system. When software is installed in Linux, it downloads all the required dependencies. Next time you install any other software, it doesn’t download the dependencies again if they match the previous one.

This is how Linux keeps the software interlinked, cleaned, and lightweight. On the other hand, Windows downloads each dependency related to an individual software and doesn’t cross-check with other similar dependencies on the system. That sometimes makes the file system heavy and unmanageable.

Linux is the result of dedicated and passionate community fans. Thus, it has a considerable volume of information and documentation that covers everything about Linux. Moreover, there are distro-specific tutorials, tips, tweaks, and forums from developers and enthusiasts to help you with any problems.

Regarding Windows OS, Microsoft is the only vendor that provides documentation for users, and sometimes, you may feel lost in finding the exact information. Like Linux, the Windows system also has a huge fanbase that provides tweaks, tutorials, and tips to solve or customize the system.

Final Thought

Linux has come a long way. There was a saying that Linux is not user-friendly, doesn’t offer many software choices, needs expert-level knowledge, the user interface is not beautiful, not easy to use, etc. But all those things mentioned above are now void.

Linux is now user-friendly, offers an intuitive and easy-to-use interface, and provides a centralized software management system with hundreds of choices. I want to share a joke with you; “What do air-conditioning and computers have in common ???!!! They are both useless when you open Windows.”

Did you like this comparison article on Linux or Windows OS? If so, then please do me a favor by sharing it on your social media. And don’t forget to share your Linux distro experience with us in the comment section.

Windows and Linux are two widely used desktop operating systems. Each has its own unique set of features and limitations, making them better suited for different individuals and their specific needs. In this comprehensive blog post, we will compare Windows and Linux in-depth, examining their features, performance, configurability, privacy, security, and gaming capabilities. Whether you are a seasoned tech expert or a complete novice, this guide will equip you with the knowledge to make an informed decision about the operating system that best aligns with your requirements.

Overview Windows

Windows, the brainchild of Microsoft, stands as the world’s most widely used operating system, dominating the personal computer (PC) market. Its user-friendly interface, extensive software compatibility, and robust hardware support have made it a household name.

Overview Linux

Emerging as a powerful alternative to Windows, Linux, an open-source operating system, has gained significant traction in recent years. Its open-source nature, customization options, and robust security have attracted a growing community of users.

Windows vs Linux: A Summary Table

Performance

Performance is a crucial factor that influences user experience and productivity. When choosing between Windows and Linux, understanding their respective performance characteristics is essential for making an informed decision.

CPU Performance

In terms of CPU performance, Windows and Linux generally exhibit comparable performance in most everyday tasks. However, slight differences may emerge in certain scenarios. For instance, some Linux distributions may demonstrate superior performance in single-threaded operations, while Windows may hold an edge in multi-threaded workloads.

RAM Usage

When it comes to RAM usage, Windows tends to consume slightly more RAM compared to Linux. This difference stems from Windows’ extensive background processes and resource-intensive applications. Linux, on the other hand, is known for its lightweight nature and efficient resource management.

Storage Requirements

Regarding storage requirements, Windows typically demands more disk space compared to Linux. A fresh Windows installation may occupy around 30GB of storage, while most Linux distributions require around 15-20GB. Some lightweight Linux distros can even operate with as little as 20MB of storage.

Gaming Performance

For gaming enthusiasts, Windows remains the dominant choice due to its extensive compatibility with gaming software and hardware. While Linux gaming has made significant strides in recent years, Windows still holds an advantage in terms of game availability and overall performance.

Overall Performance Assessment

In general, both operating systems offer satisfactory performance for everyday computing tasks. However, for demanding workloads or specialized applications, one platform may exhibit superior performance over the other.

Software Management

When you use a computer, you often need to install, update, or remove software applications. This is called software management. Windows and Linux have different ways of managing software.

Software Management in Windows

Windows relies on a decentralized approach to software management, where applications are typically downloaded and installed individually from various sources, including the Microsoft Store, official websites, and third-party websites. This approach can be convenient for users familiar with the process, but it also carries potential risks, such as encountering malware or compatibility issues.

Software Management in Linux

In contrast, Linux employs a centralized software management system, commonly utilizing package managers like APT (Advanced Package Tool) or DNF (Dandified YUM). These package managers maintain repositories of software packages, allowing users to easily install, update, and remove applications using straightforward commands. This centralized approach offers several advantages such as reduced risk of malware, simplified installation and updates, consistency and compatibility.

Comparing Software Management Approaches

Cost

When choosing an operating system for your computer, one of the things you need to think about is how much it will cost. Windows and Linux are two popular operating systems, but they have different pricing models.

Windows Licensing Costs

Microsoft Windows, a proprietary operating system, requires a paid license for each installation. The cost of a Windows license varies depending on the specific version and edition, ranging from around $99 for Windows Home to $199 for Windows Pro. For businesses and organizations, Microsoft offers volume licensing options that provide discounts for bulk purchases.

Linux Licensing Costs

In contrast, Linux, an open-source operating system, is generally available for free. Many Linux distributions, such as Ubuntu, Fedora, and Linux Mint, offer free downloads and installation without any licensing fees. This open-source nature has made Linux an attractive option for cost-conscious users and organizations.

Cost Comparison Summary

Open-Source Nature

The Essence of Open-Source

The open-source nature of Linux stands as a fundamental distinction between the two operating systems. Linux’s source code is freely available for anyone to view, modify, and distribute, fostering a collaborative environment where developers worldwide contribute to its development and enhancement. This open-source approach brings forth several advantages such as transparency, community-driven developement, rapid bug fixes and extensive customization options.

Windows’ Proprietary Approach

In contrast, Windows remains a proprietary operating system, with its source code closely guarded by Microsoft. This closed-source approach limits transparency and hinders community-driven development. While Microsoft employs a team of dedicated developers to address issues and improve Windows.

Open-Source vs Proprietary

Configurability

Configurability is an important factor for user experience, as every user has different preferences and wants their computer to look and function differently. Configurability allows users to customize their computers according to their personal preferences and needs.

Windows

Windows offers a user-friendly interface and a streamlined experience, but its customization options are relatively limited compared to Linux. Users can personalize their desktops with wallpapers, themes, and icon packs, but they have less control over the underlying system configurations and settings.

Linux

In contrast, Linux is renowned for its extensive configurability, catering to users who prefer to tailor their computing experience to their specific needs and preferences. Linux distributions provide a wide range of options for customizing the desktop environment, system settings, and even the boot process.

Comparing Configurability: A Summary Table

Privacy

In today’s digital age, privacy concerns have become increasingly important. As we entrust our personal data to various online platforms and software applications, it’s crucial to understand how our information is being collected, used, and protected. When choosing between Windows and Linux, privacy considerations play a significant role.

Windows

Windows, developed by Microsoft, has been criticized for its data collection practices, raising concerns about user privacy. By default, Windows collects various types of data, including telemetry data, browser history, and location data. While users can opt out of some data collection, the default settings raise concerns about the extent of data gathering.

Linux

In contrast to Windows’ approach, Linux generally offers more control over privacy settings and has a stronger commitment to user privacy. This stems from Linux’s open-source nature, where the source code is freely available for inspection and modification.

Comparing Privacy Approaches: Windows vs Linux

Security

In a world increasingly reliant on digital technologies, cybersecurity has become paramount. As we entrust our personal information and sensitive data to computers and online platforms, it’s crucial to understand the security measures in place to protect our assets. When choosing between Windows and Linux, security considerations play a significant role.

Windows

Windows, developed by Microsoft, has historically been more susceptible to malware attacks and security vulnerabilities compared to Linux. This is partly due to its widespread adoption and the inherent complexities of a commercial operating system.

Microsoft’s Security Efforts

• Regular Security Updates: Microsoft releases regular security updates to address newly discovered vulnerabilities.
• Security Features: Windows incorporates various security features, such as Windows Defender antivirus and firewall protection.
• Security Awareness Campaigns: Microsoft conducts regular security awareness campaigns to educate users about potential threats and safe computing practices.

Linux

Linux, with its open-source nature, offers several advantages in terms of security. The open code allows for community scrutiny, rapid vulnerability identification, and a focus on security-enhancing features.

Security Advantages of Linux

• Open-Source Code: The open-source nature of Linux allows for community review of the code, enabling early detection and fixing of security flaws.
• Rapid Vulnerability Patching: The open-source model promotes faster vulnerability patching, as security fixes are shared and implemented promptly across Linux distros.
• Security-Focused Distros: Several Linux distros prioritize security, incorporating advanced security features and hardening measures.

Comparing Security Approaches: Windows vs Linux

Gaming

In recent years, gaming has become a significant aspect of the computing experience, with millions of users enjoying a wide range of games across various genres. When choosing between Windows and Linux, gaming capabilities play a crucial role for many users.

Windows

Windows has traditionally dominated the gaming landscape due to its extensive software compatibility, broader hardware support, and the availability of popular game development tools. Major game publishers prioritize Windows, ensuring that their games are optimized and compatible with the platform.

Windows’ Gaming Features and Ecosystem

• DirectX Support: Windows provides native support for DirectX, a graphics and gaming API widely used in game development.
• Game Pass: Microsoft’s Game Pass subscription service offers a vast library of games for a monthly fee.
• Active Gaming Community: Windows boasts a large and active gaming community, providing support and multiplayer experiences.

Linux

While Linux has traditionally been considered a less popular choice for gaming, it has made significant strides in recent years, offering compatibility for a growing number of games. The open-source nature of Linux allows for community-driven development of gaming tools and compatibility layers.

Factors Contributing to Linux’s Gaming Improvements

• Proton and Steam Play: Valve’s Proton compatibility layer and Steam Play initiative have significantly enhanced Linux gaming compatibility.
• Wine and Lutris: Open-source tools like Wine and Lutris provide compatibility for many Windows games on Linux.
• Vulkan Support: Linux provides native support for Vulkan, a cross-platform graphics API with growing popularity.

Comparing Gaming Capabilities: Windows vs Linux

Conclusion

Windows and Linux are two distinct operating choice, each with its own strengths and limitations. Understanding these unique characteristics and aligning them with your individual needs and preferences is crucial for making an informed decision.

Windows offers a user-friendly interface, a vast software library, and a large community of support, making it a great option for everyday tasks, productivity, and entertainment.

Linux, on the other hand, appeals to those who value customization, open-source principles, robust security, and the freedom to tailor their computing experience. Its open-source nature fosters transparency, community-driven development, and a dynamic ecosystem.

Both Linux and Windows OS are very rich in multimedia applications, though setting up sound and video options in older versions of Linux can be difficult for some users. The main advantage of Linux is that most of the multimedia applications are freely available, while in the case of Windows, users may have to pay a hefty amount to get the software although many Open Source/Free versions are often available. Moreover, if anyone buys a copy of Windows on a CD-ROM, they do not get any application software with it, other than bundled Microsoft software. But if the same person buys a copy of Linux on a CD-ROM, it typically comes with a lot of free application software, such as Open Office, a complete free Office suite including Spreadsheets, Presentation etc. A new computer with Windows pre-installed may have additional application software but that is totally up to the PC vendor. But, each Linux distribution comes in multiple flavors; the more expensive versions come with more application software.

A major attraction of Windows is the library of games available for purchase. A majority of games support Windows and are released first for the Windows platform. Some of these games can be run on Linux with a compatibility layer like Wine, although Wine is difficult to set up and require different versions of it for various games. Others, and especially more modern games that rely on proprietary delivery systems, copy protection, Windows dependencies, or advanced acceleration features, may fail in Linux environment. Though there are exceptions, such as id Software’s Doom and Quake. When a developer chooses to write graphics code in OpenGL instead of DirectX, Linux ports can become much easier.

The video below features a comparison of Linux-based Ubuntu 12 and Windows 8.

Threats and Problems

Every Windows user has faced security and stability issues. Since Windows is the most widely used OS, hackers, spammers target Windows frequently. Consumer versions of Windows were originally designed for ease-of-use on a single-user PC without a network connection and did not have security features built in. Microsoft releases security patches through its Windows Update service approximately once a month although critical updates are made available at shorter intervals when necessary.
Many times users of Windows OS face the “BLUE SCREEN OF DEATH”, caused by the failure of the system to respond, and eventually the user has to manually restart the PC . This is very frustrating for the user since they may lose valuable data.

On the other hand, Linux is very stable and more secure than Windows. As Linux is community driven, developed through people collaboration and monitored constantly by the developers from every corner of the earth, any new problem raised can be solved within few hours and the necessary patch can be ready at the same time. Also Linux is based on the UNIX architecture which is a multi user OS, so it is much more stable than single user OS Windows.

Cost Comparison

Windows is much more costly in organizational implementation purpose. As Windows Home is a single user OS, so for each PC, the organization needs to purchase a site license copy of Windows, which can be costly. Although, in developing countries and ones with oppressive governments, non-profits can receive a free site license from Microsoft. Where as for the implementation of Linux based solutions the organization only needs to obtain one copy. And as it can be freely distributed, the same copy can be used in all the 50 employees’ workstation. However, setup and support services may need to be purchased on an as-needed basis.

Current prices for some of these products are available on Amazon.com:

According to the market research data of September 2007, on 92.63% of the world’s PCs, Windows is running, while only 0.8% PC users use Linux. The Home users, Multimedia enthusiasts mainly used Windows, where as for serious use, server application, Corporation servers are running on Linux. Irrespective of the GUI, many users find it is very difficult to use Linux as compared to Windows and so the appeal of Linux is very limited to common people. Also for licensing agreement with Microsoft, various PC vendors are entitled to bundle Windows OS with their PC. And for this Windows gain the initial market popularity over Linux. Though these days many PC vendor such as DELL, HP started to give Linux as the preinstalled OS to cut the cost of their PC system.

According to latest IDC report, Windows Server market is gaining popularity over Linux based Server. The annual rate at which Linux is growing in the x86 server space has fallen from around 53 percent in 2003 (45 percent globally), when Windows Server growth was in the mid-20 percent range, to a negative 4 percent growth (less than 10 percent globally) in calendar year 2006, IDC Quarterly Server Tracker figures show. Over the same time period, Windows has continued to report positive annual growth, outpacing the total growth rate in the x 86 markets by more than 4 percent in 2006, indicating that Linux has actually lost market share to Windows Server over this time. Linux servers now represent 12.7 percent of the overall server market while Windows server comprised 38.8 percent of all server revenue in Q1 of 2007.^[1]

The main reason is that, while Linux Servers are looking for high performance computing and web serving, but Windows is apparently adopted on a much broader basis.

History

Windows first released as a part of Disk operating System(DOS) in the year of 1985. At that time Apple’s Macintosh was a very popular OS, as it introduced GUI to the world. So to increase the popularity of DOS, Bill Gates’s Microsoft bundled Windows 1 with the DOS at that time. But until Windows 3 which was released in 1990, achieve the success in the GUI based OS market. And with the release of Windows 95, in 1995, Microsoft became a household name in the OS market. From that time on, each Personal Computer comes with Windows OS as the preinstalled OS. The biggest achievement for Windows OS is that it is very user friendly, easy to understand, and it has the versatility to run with almost every different kind of Personal Computers.

Linux is based on the Multiuser OS UNIX, and it can be distributed freely. It is the brainchild of Mr, Linus Torvalds. Typically all underlying source code can be freely modified and used. Linux Kernel was first released for public use in 1991. The biggest achievement for Linux is that it is a multiuser OS and the Security and stability is better than Windows.

References

• Security in Windows and Linux — The Register
• Wikipedia: Windows
• Server Market Grows in Third Quarter — The Windows Observer
• Linus losing to Windows — CNET
• HP TouchPad Needs 6 to 8 Weeks for Additional Shipments — eWeek
• Wikipedia: Linux