Аналог redis для windows

Historically, developers searching for a supported Redis alternative for Windows had limited options. Currently, there is no official Windows build of Redis and most of the alternatives have several drawbacks such as the first options are not Windows native, the next options are not Redis(™) API compatible and the last options do not offer a robust Enterprise-grade commercial support. This means developers have been unable to fully integrate the most popular NoSQL data store into their Windows infrastructure and benefit from the performance and reliability offered by a native implementation.

Even the official Microsoft Open Tech port of Redis (which we helped to write) has been archived and is no longer supported. We think leaving Windows developers without a native solution sucks. And that’s why we decided to take the Redis source code and port it to run natively on Windows.

We call it Memurai.

Memurai, the Redis alternative for Windows

Memurai is a Redis 5-compatible cache and data store for Windows. It’s designed to provide the reliability and performance demanded by enterprise Windows environments. Just like Redis, Memurai uses an in-memory data set to achieve great performance at scale, and Memurai supports all the Redis features that you know and love, such as persistence, replication, transactions, LUA scripting, high-availability, pub/sub, cluster, modules, streams, and LRU eviction. In fact, Memurai supports all of the Redis API 5 eviction policies.

Out of all the Redis alternatives, Memurai is one of the strongest candidates since it runs natively on Windows, it integrates into your existing Windows workflows, and allows your team to be up to speed super fast with a scalable NoSQL datastore. You have the option to run Memurai as a Windows Service, making it perfectly suited to production environments.

The Memurai installation process is designed to be extremely easy and uses a standard MSI setup for installation and configuration.The configuration file syntax for Memurai is identical to Redis 5 syntax, apart from a few flags that are simply ignored by Memurai if present (mainly flags that are specific to Linux). Only flags from the Redis configuration file are supported and no new flags are introduced by Memurai. This means you don’t have to learn new tuning parameters, and any preexisting knowledge of configuring and tuning Redis applies directly to Memurai.

Just like Redis 5, Memurai supports multiple server roles. Configure Memurai to run with the sentinel role for high availability, improve scaling with the replica role, or use the cluster role to provide automatic partitioning of your data set. And as you’d probably expect at this point, each role is fully compatible with the Redis roles of the same name.

If you’re already running Redis instances on Linux, you can replicate data between Memurai and Redis, or use both Redis and Memurai within the same cluster. Running multiple instances of Memurai is no problem either and you can run more than one instance simultaneously (provided that you configure them to run on different ports).

For some Redis workloads, ensuring that your in-memory data set is safely written to disk is critical to ensuring the data set isn’t lost and that it can be quickly rebuilt if Redis restarts. Memurai supports persisting data to disk either synchronously or asynchronously. Internally, Redis uses the fork() system call to perform asynchronous writes, but that’s not an option for Memurai because fork() doesn’t exist on Windows. Instead, Memurai uses Windows shared memory to implement a start-of-the-art version of fork() that’s finely tuned for performance and allows Memurai to create data snapshots while still serving clients requests. Data can be written using the same AOF and RDB formats as Redis 5. RDB persists in-memory data to disk at specified intervals, and the AOF format is used to log every write operation received by the server, allowing Memurai to replay each log entry on startup to rebuild the in-memory data set.

Memurai comes with its own client, a command-line interface app known as memurai-cli.exe. But since Memurai is Redis-compatible and supports the full Redis 5 API, you’re able to use any redis client library to connect to Memurai and send commands. That includes using the official Redis CLI, redis-cli, on a Linux machine to connect a Memurai server running on Windows, or even connecting to a Redis instance on Linux with memurai-cli.exe.

But what if you’ve got favourite Redis modules that you want to use? Memurai supports the Redis 5 modules API too — Memurai was built to be a true drop-in replacement for Redis on Windows.

Get your Redis server Windows alternative

The majority of our customers start their exploration by test driving Memurai Developer for free. Once they are convinced that this is a robust solution, they reach out to us inquiring about Memurai Enterprise.
Premium support and an unrestricted feature set paired with the strong performance speaks for itself for this Redis server windows option. We keep our documentation up to date, follow our Stack Overflow channels, and respond to our comunity. Give it a try or get in touch with a Memurai expert for a free consultation https://www.memurai.com/get-memurai.

Redis is a trademark of Redis Ltd. Any rights therein are reserved to Redis Ltd. Any use by Memurai is for referential purposes only and does not indicate any sponsorship, endorsement or affiliation between Redis and Memurai

Best Redis Alternatives for Windows

If you want similar software to Redis, we have a list for that. Are there Redis alternatives out there? Let’s find out.

28 Mar 2025 | 8 min read

When it comes to storing and managing data, Redis is a widely preferred option because of its fast performance and effectiveness. It is a memory-based data structure repository that accommodates different data types and is commonly utilized for caching real-time analytics, and messaging. Nevertheless, Redis was mainly designed for UNIX platforms such as Linux, so its functionality and suitability on Windows may not always be optimal.

Although there is a Windows release of Redis, it might not consistently provide the equivalent reliability, stability, or support as on Unix-based platforms. This may pose difficulties for developers and businesses that depend on Windows systems. Consequently, there is an increasing demand to investigate other options that can offer comparable features but are better suited for the Windows operating system.

Why Look for Redis Alternatives

Redis is recognized for its speed and flexibility, making it a potent tool, but there are difficulties when running it on Windows. The original intention for Redis was to be used on Unix-like systems, so its Windows iteration may occasionally be less dependable. Users could face performance problems, intermittent crashes, or challenges with updates and support. The Redis Windows port is not actively supported, potentially causing issues with compatibility with Windows updates or other programs.

Sometimes, these restrictions have the potential to create issues in actual work settings. For instance, companies depending on Windows servers may consider Redis to be an unreliable option for their essential applications. Developers may face challenges if they need to integrate Redis with other Windows-based tools or if they require continuous updates and long-term support.

Considering these obstacles, it is crucial to explore other options that are more appropriate for Windows operating systems. These options could provide comparable characteristics to Redis but with improved speed, more straightforward compatibility, and more dependable assistance for Windows platforms. Instances, where an alternative could be more desirable, include cases where stability is vital, when strong integration with other Windows apps is needed, or when long-term support and updates are crucial for the project’s success.

Criteria for Choosing an Alternative

When searching for a substitute for Redis on Windows, it is essential to take into account a number of crucial elements in order to select the correct option.

Initially, performance is essential. Because Redis is recognized for its fast performance, any substitute must be capable of handling data rapidly and effectively. If the substitute cannot meet the requirements of your application, it might not be a suitable alternative.

After that, ensuring compatibility with Windows is of utmost importance. The other option should function seamlessly on Windows without needing intricate setups or solutions. It should be specifically tailored or optimized to operate smoothly on Windows systems to prevent potential problems that can occur with Redis on this platform.

Lastly, take into account the features that are vital for your particular scenario. If you depend on certain features of Redis, like data persistence, clustering, or specific data types, the substitute should provide comparable capabilities. Furthermore, adequate documentation, support from the community, and the system’s user-friendliness are crucial elements for a seamless transition and sustained success with the new system. By paying attention to these factors, you can choose a substitute for Redis that fits your requirements and functions effectively on your Windows system.

Top Redis Alternatives for Windows

Memcached

Memcached is a decentralized memory caching system aimed at enhancing the performance of dynamic web applications by decreasing the strain on the database while remaining efficient. It is a popular choice for storing small data fragments such as database call results, API call outcomes, and page rendering data due to its simplicity and effectiveness. Memcached works by storing information in RAM, enabling rapid data access.

Comparison to Redis

Although Memcached and Redis are both utilized for caching purposes, they possess distinct vital variations. Memcached is essential and only concentrates on caching without any assistance for data persistence or complex data structures. On the other hand, Redis provides a broader variety of features such as data persistence, more intricate data structures (such as lists, sets, and sorted sets), and built-in replication and clustering.

Pros and Cons on Windows

• Pros: Memcached is recognized for its lightweight nature and simplicity in setting up on Windows. It uses very few resources, which is advantageous for applications requiring straightforward, high-speed caching. Furthermore, the simplicity of Memcached can streamline maintenance and troubleshooting in a Windows setting.
• Cons: Nevertheless, the simplicity of Memcached can also act as a restriction. If the server goes down, any cached data is lost as it does not have data persistence. Furthermore, it does not have the additional capabilities and versatility that Redis provides. For applications requiring advanced caching features, Memcached may not be adequate.

Couchbase

Couchbase is recognized for its versatility and capability to manage various data types as a NoSQL database. It merges the functions of a key-value store and a document-oriented database, making it versatile for different purposes, ranging from caching to comprehensive database administration. Couchbase is created to offer consistent access, expandability, and effectiveness, utilizing characteristics such as automated data duplication, decentralized structure, and backing for advanced inquiries using its SQL-like query language, N1QL.

Картинка с сайта: www.tpointtech.com

Comparison with Redis

While Couchbase and Redis have some similarities in their functions, they are mainly used for distinct purposes. Redis is primarily a high-performance in-memory storage system focused on caching, whereas Couchbase provides a broader database solution including persistent storage, indexing, and querying features. Couchbase specializes in managing intricate data structures and offers inherent assistance for distributed tasks, while Redis shines in situations needing fast data retrieval.

Pros and Cons on Windows

• Pros: Couchbase is fully compatible with Windows and provides solid tools for overseeing extensive applications. Its versatility lies in its capability to manage both key-value and document-based data, while its backing for SQL-like queries is advantageous for developers accustomed to relational databases. Moreover, the reliability of Couchbase on Windows servers is enhanced by its built-in replication and failover mechanisms.
• Cons: Setting up and managing Couchbase can be more challenging compared to Redis, especially for primary uses like caching. More resources are needed, which may not be suitable for lightweight applications. Couchbase could be too much for those seeking a simple in-memory caching solution.

Aerospike

Aerospike is a rapid NoSQL database designed for real-time applications requiring quick response times and high reliability. Created to efficiently handle large volumes of data reliably, it is ideal for tasks such as detecting fraud, hosting live auctions, and maintaining user profiles. Aerospike utilizes a mixture of memory models, keeping indexes in RAM while also saving data on rapid storage systems such as SSDs, enabling it to provide both quick performance and long-lasting data. It also backs distributed activities, guaranteeing data is duplicated and consistently accessible on various nodes.

Comparison to Redis

Aerospike and Redis are renowned for their fast performance, catering to slightly different requirements. Redis is a high-performing in-memory datastore that is particularly good at caching and basic data manipulation operations. In contrast, Aerospike is tailored for intricate, extensive applications that necessitate durable storage and robust data management functionalities. Although Redis is typically utilized for short-term data storage, Aerospike is better suited for situations where ensuring data durability and consistency is essential.

Pros and Cons on Windows

• Pros: Aerospike provides robust Windows support and includes functionalities that are ideal for corporate settings. The capacity to manage large volumes of data quickly is a significant benefit, particularly for tasks requiring instantaneous performance. The combination storage method also guarantees data integrity, striking a balance between quick access and resilience.
• Cons: Nevertheless, setting up and managing Aerospike may prove to be more intricate compared to Redis, especially for smaller or straightforward projects. It also demands additional resources, including hardware and configuration, that may be excessive for applications with basic caching requirements. Aerospike could be too robust for developers seeking a simple, in-memory solution.

Other Notable Alternatives

In addition to Memcached, Couchbase, and Aerospike, there are numerous other Redis substitutes to explore specifically for Windows setups. One option to consider is Apache Ignite. It is a platform for in-memory computing that provides caching and complete database features. Ignite is highly versatile for various applications due to its support for SQL, key-value, and other data models. It seamlessly integrates with existing databases, boosting performance without the need for a complete system overhaul.

Another choice is Hazelcast, a distributed data grid that stores data in memory and is perfect for applications that require high availability and scalability. Like Redis, Hazelcast provides various data structures and is well-suited for activities like caching, session handling, and immediate processing. Its reliable option for Windows-based systems is due to its robust clustering and fault-tolerance capabilities.

Ehcache is a viable alternative, especially if you want a straightforward and effective caching solution. Integrating with Java applications is simple and offers efficient performance with little setup required. While these options may not entirely substitute Redis in every situation, they provide distinct characteristics that may be more appropriate based on your particular requirements in a Windows setting.

Comparison of Alternatives

Performance is a crucial aspect to consider when evaluating alternative options for Redis on Windows. Memcached is efficient and speedy for basic caching needs but does not have the advanced capabilities required for complex tasks. Aerospike and Couchbase both deliver high performance when dealing with large amounts of data, with Aerospike standing out in low-latency environments and Couchbase offering strong data management capabilities.

In terms of simplicity in setup and configuration, Memcached is the easiest, making it perfect for basic caching requirements. Couchbase and Aerospike are more potent options but demand additional time and expertise for installation and setup, particularly for inexperienced users. Both Hazelcast and Apache Ignite provide a moderate level of difficulty with thorough documentation to assist users in setting up their systems.

In terms of community and support, Redis benefits significantly from its extensive and engaged community. Among the various options, Couchbase and Hazelcast also boast robust communities and thorough documentation, facilitating the discovery of assistance and resources. Aerospike and Apache Ignite also provide vital support despite having smaller communities than Redis. In general, the decision of which alternative to choose is based on the particular requirements of your application and the amount of support you need.

Conclusion

In conclusion, although Redis is a robust tool, it may not be the most suitable for Windows environments because of compatibility and stability concerns. Various options such as Memcached, Couchbase, Aerospike, Apache Ignite, and Hazelcast provide distinct advantages, varying from basic caching to comprehensive database solutions. The optimal selection varies according to your particular requirements, such as functionality, user-friendliness, and support options. By carefully evaluating these elements, you can choose the best choice for your Windows-oriented projects.