Для пользователей видеокарт AMD Radeon хорошая новость: переход с Windows на Linux почти не влияет на производительность в играх.
По результатам тестов, карты AMD демонстрируют схожую производительность на обеих системах. А вот владельцам видеокарт NVIDIA повезло меньше — здесь Linux заметно уступает Windows.
Тестирование проводил YouTube-канал Tech YES City, а для Linux использовали дистрибутив Bazzite. Это был второй раунд тестов, так как в предыдущем не была включена совместимость со Steam, что отрицательно сказалось на результатах.
Что такое Bazzite?
Bazzite — это дистрибутив Linux, основанный на Fedora Atomic и адаптированный для геймеров. Он поставляется с предустановленным Steam, поддержкой HDR и VRR, а также улучшенными планировщиками для плавного игрового процесса.
В официальном описании говорится, что дистрибутив подходит как для новичков, так и для опытных пользователей, упрощая настройку игр и стриминга.
Результаты тестов
В играх вроде Cyberpunk 2077 на видеокарте NVIDIA RTX 4090 производительность на Bazzite оказалась ниже, чем на Windows, причём как при 1440p, так и при 4K. Однако для AMD Radeon таких падений замечено не было:
Игра Rift Breaker стала исключением, где Linux показал сопоставимую производительность даже на NVIDIA. Но в целом для фанатов видеокарт Хуанга переход на Linux связан с ощутимыми потерями:
Напомним, что для запуска игр на Bazzite требуется видеокарта с поддержкой Vulkan 1.3 и 64-битный процессор. Проверить совместимость можно с помощью утилиты GPU-Z, которая покажет текущую версию Vulkan.
- In this comprehensive analysis, we will delve into the intricacies of AMD GPU performance on Linux and Windows, examining various factors that influence gaming, professional applications, and overall system stability.
- By the end of this detailed comparison, you will have a clear understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each platform, enabling you to make an informed decision based on your specific needs and preferences.
- A strong community and support ecosystem can be invaluable when encountering issues or seeking assistance with your operating system or hardware.
The debate over which operating system offers better performance for AMD GPUs has been ongoing for years, with both Linux and Windows proponents presenting compelling arguments. In this comprehensive analysis, we will delve into the intricacies of AMD GPU performance on Linux and Windows, examining various factors that influence gaming, professional applications, and overall system stability. By the end of this detailed comparison, you will have a clear understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each platform, enabling you to make an informed decision based on your specific needs and preferences.
Gaming Performance
When it comes to gaming, the choice between Linux and Windows can significantly impact performance. Windows has traditionally held the upper hand in this area due to its extensive game library, native support for DirectX, and optimized drivers. However, Linux has made significant strides in recent years, thanks to the efforts of open-source developers and initiatives like Steam Play and Proton.
Windows:
- Pros:
- Extensive game library, including many AAA titles not available on Linux
- Native support for DirectX, the dominant graphics API for Windows games
- Optimized drivers from AMD, ensuring maximum performance in most games
- Cons:
- Potential compatibility issues with some games, especially older or less popular titles
- Occasional performance overhead due to the Windows operating system itself
Linux:
- Pros:
- Improved performance in some games, particularly those that are well-optimized for Linux
- Reduced input latency, leading to smoother and more responsive gameplay
- Open-source drivers that are constantly being updated and improved
- Cons:
- Smaller game library compared to Windows
- Potential compatibility issues with some games, especially those that rely heavily on DirectX
- Occasional performance issues due to driver overhead or game-specific optimizations
Professional Applications
AMD GPUs are also widely used in professional applications such as video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific simulations. In these scenarios, performance and stability are of paramount importance.
Windows:
- Pros:
- Wide range of professional applications available, many of which are optimized for Windows
- Stable and reliable operating system, minimizing the risk of crashes or errors
- Cons:
- Potential compatibility issues with some applications, especially those that are Linux-native
- Occasional performance overhead due to the Windows operating system itself
Linux:
- Pros:
- Improved performance in some applications, particularly those that are well-optimized for Linux
- Reduced input latency, leading to smoother and more responsive workflows
- Open-source drivers that are constantly being updated and improved
- Cons:
- Smaller selection of professional applications compared to Windows
- Potential compatibility issues with some applications, especially those that rely on proprietary Windows technologies
- Occasional performance issues due to driver overhead or application-specific optimizations
Overall System Stability
System stability is another crucial factor to consider when choosing between Linux and Windows. A stable operating system ensures smooth operation, fewer crashes, and better overall user experience.
Windows:
- Pros:
- Generally considered to be more stable than Linux, with fewer reported crashes and errors
- Wide range of hardware and software compatibility, reducing the likelihood of encountering driver or software conflicts
- Cons:
- Potential stability issues due to malware, viruses, or poorly written software
- Occasional updates that can introduce bugs or compatibility problems
Linux:
- Pros:
- Generally considered to be more secure than Windows, with a lower risk of malware or virus infections
- Open-source nature allows for greater customization and control over the operating system, potentially improving stability
- Cons:
- Potential stability issues due to driver conflicts or poorly written software
- Occasional updates that can introduce bugs or compatibility problems
Hardware Support
Hardware support is another important consideration, especially for users with specific hardware configurations or peripherals.
Windows:
- Pros:
- Extensive hardware support, including a wide range of graphics cards, motherboards, and peripherals
- Native support for many popular hardware devices, reducing the need for additional drivers
- Cons:
- Potential compatibility issues with some older or less popular hardware devices
- Occasional driver updates required to maintain compatibility with new hardware
Linux:
- Pros:
- Improved hardware support in recent years, thanks to the efforts of open-source developers
- Active community support for a wide range of hardware devices, including niche or older products
- Cons:
- Potential compatibility issues with some hardware devices, especially those that lack Linux drivers
- Occasional driver updates required to maintain compatibility with new hardware
Community and Support
A strong community and support ecosystem can be invaluable when encountering issues or seeking assistance with your operating system or hardware.
Windows:
- Pros:
- Extensive community and support resources available online and through Microsoft’s official channels
- Wide range of tutorials, guides, and troubleshooting resources for common issues
- Cons:
- Potential difficulty in finding support for specific hardware or software configurations
- Occasional delays in receiving official support from Microsoft
Linux:
- Pros:
- Active and supportive community of Linux users and developers, providing assistance through forums, online communities, and mailing lists
- Extensive documentation and tutorials available online, covering a wide range of topics
- Cons:
- Potential difficulty in finding support for specific hardware or software configurations
- Occasional delays in receiving official support from hardware manufacturers
Cost
Cost is another factor that may influence your decision between Linux and Windows.
Windows:
- Pros:
- Windows 10 Home edition is available for purchase at a relatively affordable price
- Frequent sales and discounts on Windows licenses
- Cons:
- Windows 10 Pro edition is more expensive than the Home edition
- Ongoing costs for Windows updates and security patches
Linux:
- Pros:
- Linux distributions are generally free to download and use
- No ongoing costs for software updates or security patches
- Cons:
- Potential costs associated with purchasing commercial Linux distributions or support services
The Verdict: Which Platform is Right for You?
The choice between Linux and Windows for AMD GPU performance ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize gaming and have a wide range of games in your library, Windows may be the better option due to its extensive game library and native DirectX support. However, if you are primarily interested in professional applications or value open-source software, Linux offers improved performance, reduced input latency, and a more customizable operating system. Ultimately, the best way to determine which platform is right for you is to try them both and see which one meets your requirements and preferences the best.
Quick Answers to Your FAQs
Q: Which operating system offers better overall performance for AMD GPUs?
A: The performance of AMD GPUs can vary depending on the specific application or game. In general, Windows tends to offer better performance for gaming due to its extensive game library and native DirectX support. However, Linux can provide improved performance in some professional applications and offers reduced input latency.
Q: Is Linux a good choice for gaming with an AMD GPU?
A: Yes, Linux has become a viable option for gaming with an AMD GPU. Thanks to initiatives like Steam Play and Proton, many Windows games can now be played on Linux. Additionally, Linux offers improved performance in some games and reduced input latency, making it a good choice for gamers who value these aspects.
Q: Are AMD GPUs well-supported on Linux?
A: Yes, AMD GPUs are generally well-supported on Linux. AMD provides open-source drivers for its GPUs, which are constantly being updated and improved. Additionally, the Linux community provides extensive support for AMD GPUs, including documentation, tutorials, and troubleshooting resources.
Isaac Lee is the lead tech blogger for Vtech Insider. With over 10 years of experience reviewing consumer electronics and emerging technologies, he is passionate about sharing his knowledge to help readers make informed purchasing decisions.
Тесты показывают, что владельцам Ryzen 7 9700X стоит обратить внимание на Linux Nobara.
В своих рекламных материалах, посвящённых возможностям процессоров Ryzen 9000 на основе архитектуры Zen 5, компания AMD сообщала о весомом увеличении IPC новых моделей, достигающем 16%, но реальные тесты новинок от ряда изданий разочаровали пользователей — одна из проблем может заключаться не только в сравнительно низком увеличении быстродействия, но и непосредственно в ОС Windows 11, которая, судя по всему, в настоящий момент плохо оптимизирована для моделей Ryzen 9000, что демонстрируют результаты тестов издания PC Games Hardware (PCGH), на что указывают журналисты сайта Neowin.
Источник фото: AMD/Pixabay
Специалисты PCGH сравнили производительность восьмиядерного процессора AMD Ryzen 7 9700X в новейшей версии Windows 11 24H2 и дистрибутиве Linux Nobara, оптимизированном для игр — как оказалось, Windows 11 в настоящее время выглядит не лучшим выбором для геймеров, обладающих процессором линейки Ryzen 9000.
Опубликованные результаты тестов наглядно демонстрируют преимущество Linux для новых моделей CPU от AMD – например, в игре Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty, которая ощутимо нагружает процессор, Linux Nobara обеспечила на 6% более высокий показатель для среднего fps по сравнению с Windows 11 24H2, а в Red Dead Redemption 2 добилась преимущества в 13%.
При этом отставание Windows 11 24H2 не ограничивается одними лишь играми — например, в 7-Zip ОС Linux Nobara позволила Ryzen 7 9700X продемонстрировать более высокую производительность в процессе распаковки и сжатия файлов.
Источник фото: Neowin/PC Games Hardware
Отмечается, что в настоящее время Windows 11 24H2 официально доступна лишь для устройств Copilot+ PC, поэтому процесс её оптимизации для процессоров AMD, судя по всему, ещё не завершён.
Telegram-канал @overclockers_news — теперь в новом формате. Подписывайся, чтобы быть в курсе всех новостей!
AMD GPU Performance Comparison: Linux vs Windows (Ubuntu) — Stable Diffusion
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Background: AMD GPU in Linux
- Comparison Setup: Machine and Software
- Comparison Methodology
- Performance Analysis on Windows
- Performance Analysis on Ubuntu
- Conclusion
- Pros and Cons of AMD GPU Performance in Linux
- Future Outlook
- References
Introduction
👋 Welcome to my Channel! In this video, we will be discussing the performance of AMD GPUs in Linux for running Stable Diffusion. Many viewers have been curious about this topic, so today I wanted to take the opportunity to do a head-to-head comparison. I will be using the same machine and GPU model (6700 XT) for both Linux and Windows, running the exact same code. There are slight differences in software availability between the two operating systems, but we will discuss those as we go along. Let’s dive in and see how the AMD GPU performs in Linux compared to Windows!
Background: AMD GPU in Linux
To understand the performance of AMD GPUs in Linux, it is essential to have some background knowledge. AMD GPUs have gained popularity due to their strong performance and affordability. However, their compatibility and performance in Linux-based operating systems have been a topic of discussion among enthusiasts.
Comparison Setup: Machine and Software
Before we jump into the performance analysis, let’s set up the comparison by discussing the machine and software used. The machine used for this test is identical for both Linux and Windows, ensuring a fair and accurate comparison. We will be using a 6700 XT GPU, which is known for its excellent performance.
In terms of software, it is worth noting that Linux offers a warm software called The Rock M, which is not available on Windows. This slight difference may affect the performance comparison, as we will elaborate on later.
Comparison Methodology
To ensure an unbiased comparison, we will be running the exact same Package and Python code on both Linux and Windows. This will allow us to clearly identify any performance differences between the two operating systems. We will measure performance based on factors such as GPU usage, VRAM usage, and system RAM usage.
Performance Analysis on Windows
Let’s begin by analyzing the performance of the AMD GPU in a Windows environment. We will activate our Python virtual environment and import the necessary functions and modules. A familiar code will be executed, which involves the construction of a stable diffusion pipeline. Throughout the process, we will closely monitor the GPU usage, VRAM usage, and system RAM usage.
Upon running the code, we observe that the GPU starts loading the model into the VRAM. Multiple rounds of image generation are performed, with each round showing improvements in speed. Although there might be occasional warnings, the overall performance is acceptable.
Performance Analysis on Ubuntu
Now, let’s switch gears and analyze the performance of the AMD GPU in Ubuntu, a popular Linux distribution. We will start by activating the Python virtual environment and importing the necessary modules. Similar to the Windows setup, we will construct a stable diffusion pipeline and load the model into the GPU.
After the initial loading of the model, we proceed to generate images using the wife diffuser method. The system might display a warning, but it does not significantly affect the performance. The first round of image generation might take some time, but subsequent rounds demonstrate a significant improvement in speed.
Comparing the performance of the AMD GPU in Linux and Windows, we observe a remarkable difference. While Windows takes approximately 28 seconds to generate images, Linux achieves the same in just 7 seconds. This significant time reduction showcases the superior performance of AMD GPUs in Linux environments.
Conclusion
In conclusion, our head-to-head comparison of the performance of AMD GPUs in Linux and Windows reveals a clear winner. Linux outperforms Windows, demonstrating faster image generation times by one-fourth of the duration. The specific software availability in Linux, such as The Rock M, contributes to this performance advantage. Enthusiasts and professionals seeking optimal GPU performance for stable diffusion can rely on Linux with confidence.
Pros and Cons of AMD GPU Performance in Linux
Pros:
- Faster image generation times compared to Windows
- Availability of specialized software like The Rock M in Linux
- Affordable performance offered by AMD GPUs
Cons:
- Limited software compatibility in Linux compared to Windows
- Steeper learning curve for Linux-based environments
Future Outlook
The performance of AMD GPUs in Linux is promising, and the future looks bright. As Linux gains more mainstream adoption and further software optimizations are made, we can expect even better performance and compatibility for AMD GPUs. Developers and enthusiasts should keep an eye on the evolving landscape of Linux GPU performance.
References
- The Rock M website: www.therockm.com
Windows vs Linux Gaming Performance Comparison: AMD vs Nvidia
In the evolving landscape of technology, gaming has become a multi-faceted domain that embraces various operating systems, graphics hardware, and software ecosystems. The rivalry between Windows and Linux remains a pivotal topic among gamers, each platform offering its unique advantages and challenges. Simultaneously, graphics cards from AMD and Nvidia present their own benefits and trade-offs, adding further nuances to the discussion. This article delves into the gaming performance comparison between Windows and Linux while contrasting the capabilities of AMD and Nvidia graphics cards within each environment.
Understanding the Gaming Landscape
Before diving into performance specifics, it is vital to understand the gaming landscape’s context. Windows has long been regarded as the premier operating system for gaming, comprising the majority of the gaming market share. The reasons for this status are manifold, including extensive developer support, a plethora of available titles, and compatibility with various hardware configurations.
Conversely, Linux has historically lagged behind Windows in the gaming arena. Nevertheless, the advent of platforms like SteamOS, Proton, and advancements in compatibility layers has fostered a budding interest in Linux gaming. With the rise of open-source software and community-driven development, Linux has successfully attracted a segment of the gaming populace, spurring curiosity regarding its performance compared to Windows.
Windows Gaming Performance
Windows 10 and 11 dominate the gaming sphere primarily due to their optimization for DirectX, Microsoft’s proprietary application programming interface (API) designed specifically for gaming. Features integral to gaming performance, like DirectX 12, provide low-level hardware access, allowing developers to pull more performance from CPU and GPU resources. Moreover, Windows supports a robust library of games, with approximately 80% or more of all released titles being Windows-compatible.
The integration of software features such as Game Mode, a performance optimization tool, also enhances gaming experiences on Windows. Game Mode focuses CPU and GPU resources on the active game, creating a smoother overall user experience.
Windows also boasts high compatibility with graphics drivers from both AMD and Nvidia. Nvidia’s Game Ready Driver updates ensure optimal performance for the latest titles, while AMD’s Adrenaline drivers focus on stability and performance enhancements through regular updates. This constant support ensures that gamers on Windows can maximize their hardware’s potential.
Linux Gaming Performance
Historically, Linux’s relationship with gaming has been tumultuous, often marred by compatibility issues and a lack of supported titles. However, with the introduction of Steam’s Proton – a compatibility layer that allows Windows games to run on Linux – and the expansion of native Linux titles, this landscape has shifted.
While many games still run better on Windows, the performance on Linux has shown significant improvement. Proton allows many Windows-centric games to run effectively on Linux, often with few performance downgrades. Tools like Lutris further streamline the gaming experience by facilitating the installation and configuration of Windows games on Linux.
Despite the strides made, some gamers may still experience hurdles, particularly with anti-cheat systems, virtual machines, and certain DirectX features. A primary concern for many gamers is the lack of optimized drivers compared to Windows. However, both AMD and Nvidia have taken steps to improve their Linux driver support.
Nvidia has traditionally provided a closed-source driver, which, while optimized for gaming, can pose issues for users who favor open-source software. On the other hand, AMD has embraced an open-source model with its Radeon Software for Linux, leading to increased stability and support for gaming performance.
Performance Benchmarks: AMD vs Nvidia on Windows
To effectively assess the performance comparison between AMD and Nvidia on Windows, we can look at several key titles and metrics under controlled conditions. Popular benchmarks include FPS (frames per second), load times, and thermal performance under load.
- Graphics Performance (FPS)
When testing high-end cards like Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 3080 and AMD’s Radeon RX 6800 XT in AAA titles such as “Cyberpunk 2077” or “Call of Duty: Modern Warfare,” both cards consistently demonstrate strong performance.
- Cyberpunk 2077: The RTX 3080 tends to outperform the RX 6800 XT at ultra settings, particularly when ray tracing is enabled, leveraging Nvidia’s DLSS technology. The RX 6800 XT, however, maintains competitive performance at max settings without ray tracing, especially in terms of raw frame rates.
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare: Both GPUs perform admirably, with the RTX 3080 often pulling ahead in high refresh rate situations and competitive gaming, primarily due to its better support for higher frame rates.
- Load Times and Thermal Performance
Load times differ notably based on the underlying architecture and optimizations. Games on NVMe SSDs generally load much faster than on HDDs regardless of GPU, but among GPUs, Nvidia has been reported to handle thermal throttling slightly better than AMD under extended load, leading to sustained performance in long gaming sessions.
Performance Benchmarks: AMD vs Nvidia on Linux
When examining performance on Linux, benchmark tests have shown varying outcomes, primarily influenced by Linux’s driver support and the compatibility of Proton with specific titles.
- Graphics Performance (FPS)
Taking similar titles into account while playing on Linux, such as “DOOM Eternal” and “Shadow of the Tomb Raider,” we see the following results:
-
DOOM Eternal: Both the RX 6800 XT and RTX 3080 perform remarkably well, closely mirroring each other in FPS when using Vulkan – a graphics API well-supported in offline and Linux environments. The key factor becomes driver support and optimization, where AMD has traditionally fared better due to its open-source nature on Linux.
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: In setups using Proton and various settings, results can be inconsistent. The RTX 3080 might have a slight edge in direct rendering through Vulkan, but variability in frame rates can sometimes level out performance due to Proton’s overhead and implementation.
- Load Times and Thermal Performance
For load times, it’s crucial to remember that Linux distributions often have different filesystems, which can affect performance. SSDs utilized across platforms yield similar results, but thermal performances under load continue to favor Nvidia due to its existing optimizations.
In-Depth: Optimization and Compatibility
As we analyze further into optimization, we note that many new gaming engines favor open-source drivers and modern APIs like Vulkan, which allow more equal footing between AMD and Nvidia. While Nvidia holds the unwavering lead in Ray Tracing performance, AMD has made significant strides with its RDNA architecture, enabling competitive performance in rasterization tasks.
Compatibility with modern gaming engines plays a large role in determining overall game performance. Both AMD and Nvidia have shown continued support for the latest APIs, but the way software handles these graphics cards on both Windows and Linux is key. Developers tend to optimize much more for Windows, leading to performance disparities.
Future of Gaming on Windows and Linux
Considering the future, game developers continue to seek ways to maximize performance on both platforms. Increased adoption of Linux by major gaming engines, combined with community advocacy for driver improvements, may culminate in a more leveled playing field.
Nvidia’s investments in both cloud gaming and hardware developments indicate a long-term confidence in Windows as the primary gaming OS. Meanwhile, AMD seems committed to pushing their Linux drivers further into the spotlight, encouraging developers to consider supporting Linux as a viable gaming environment.
Furthermore, the rise of cloud gaming services presents an intrinsic challenge. If the underlying platform issues fade, it might shift focus away from pure hardware comparisons to an ecosystem-driven model.
Conclusion
The gaming performance comparison between Windows and Linux, especially while considering the AMD vs Nvidia debate, reflects a tumultuous yet promising evolution in gaming technology. Windows undeniably retains the crown for optimal gaming performance, especially when it comes to game support and driver optimization. However, Linux is making significant strides, especially with the upcoming developments in Proton and open-source driver improvements.
Graphics cards from both AMD and Nvidia offer compelling choices, with each card having its own strengths and performance marks under both operating systems. As gamers maximize their experiences across Windows and Linux, the continuing developments in hardware and software promise to narrow the performance gaps seen today.
The gaming community thrives on choice, and as changes ensue, it is crucial for both newcomers and veterans alike to explore the opportunities that each platform presents, ensuring that every gaming experience remains engaging and rewarding. Ultimately, the choice between Windows and Linux, AMD and Nvidia, should be made based on individual needs, preferences, and the ever-changing landscape of the gaming ecosystem.